Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Do Women Feet Smell More In Nylons?

5.AMPLIACION CREATURES (2): Magnus 4.Efecto

dwindling creatures Extension:


The second subject we deal with Little Creatures , and now, I'll expand some more things about them.
As he had remarked that there were such creatures or some reduced in size would have some difficulties (the sound of voices, bones, temperature, relative strength and food) ... they also add some other problems and take advantage of this size.



* Water:

What if the little creature out of a river?

- If we consider a normal sized person leaves the water when it is attached to your skin a ¼ liter, as compared with the tiny person (which would be identical to the normal person, except that it has X times smaller in size), would also have a thin film of water on his body, although minor, for him, in relation to its size would be a great weight. Therefore, unlike what happens to people of normal size, this being would be very difficult to move swiftly.

To explain the mobility or lack of it if it is soaked in water, we use the Reynolds number indicates the ability displacement of a body in a fluid and is given by the ratio of inertial forces and viscous forces, with which the displacement in a fluid depends on the size. The larger the body, the greater the Reynolds number and, conversely, the smaller, the lower your number.

surface tension also acts in the case of the drops of water. In the movie "The Incredible Shrinking Man " when you drop a drop of water on to star t influences the surface ENSIONS

* much muscle and physiological problems:

A diminutive man robust and would be too much muscle, so these muscles could destroy his body. This is what should have happened in the film shrinking man. By contrast, a man who has been increased in size would be fragile and, as already mentioned it in the first inning, would have a very small relative strength.

By reducing the size of the average person, also reduces the lungs, arteries, ... but not enough and this would reduce their metabolic rate would continue to be above normal, which would cause some failures. Therefore people who have a larger than normal or much lower the average tend to live a few years and have physiological problems.



* Previously also commented on the problem of communication with others of normal size or larger, given the frequency of the sounds (if you remember, the smaller the creature, the more acute is the voice and how much more is to be more serious is the voice), this also must add the time difference would need to say the same sentence ... For example, a giant take longer to say "Hello" to a person normal.



After all these problems and disadvantages Why would anyone want to be tiny? Would I find any advantage in it?

If you plan far from certain heights fall off ... you would not hurt to have somewhat reduced in size, would be a great advantage:

An object in free fall as the air reaches the speed limit when its weight equals the resistance force opposes the advance of the air. This resistance depends, for small speeds, frame rate on the fluid. Which is to say that the smaller the object falls, the lower the speed with which it does.


Tattoo Aveeno Baby Lotion



Physics and Sports:

thought that this entry had already published some time ago, but I was wrong .. now I found when I went up the other.

Sometimes when we see a football game or a repetition of certain releases we keep the mouth open (at least to me if that ever happened to me xD). People tend to talk a lot about sports and the bus is a good place for it (a peak travel time and gives a lot of things ...) and even if you do not participate in the conversation as you learn to have them around. I came to my mind one of the conversations, and discuss how it gives the effect in some sports balls / balls.

Who has not ever released a shot with effect? Who has not tried to stop a throw threaded playing ping pong and the ball is gone for a walk?

Newton in the past and noticed the curved path of a spherical projectile that could follow a tennis ball because friction but the theory is known at present corresponds to a study by Magnus.

" The Magnus Effect could be explained as the shot in which the rotating ball creates a vortex of air around them, carrying the same direction as the flow of air which presents the ball, thus increasing the speed on that side of the ball. On the other side of the ball the vortex rotates in the opposite direction of airflow, which causes slow down due to friction, so the air pressure is lower on one side than another, causing a force perpendicular to the direction of the airflow that bypasses the area of \u200b\u200bhis career. "

therefore affects rotating bodies perpendicular to its movement through a fluid. When moving in the air is a resistance which depends on the relative velocity of the object from the air and in the case of the ball, this force is greater on one side than another.

"Wanted "

If we translate this into a movie like "Wanted" in which bullets are diverted from straight and around obstacles to reach the desired goal that is because there is a force that causes the bullet to make a rope and the force that causes this rope is a force that interacts with the bullet's flight.

Therefore, if you can deflect bullets as the Magnus effect, but one thing is divert .. and another to do the film.

leave here a trailer of the movie in case some do not know. That looks like fire and save the obstacle to reach the target of the fund.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7ftozVc3lI

also leave this web on aerodynamics in table tennis is very interesting.

Monday, December 8, 2008

Braces And Drinking Red Wine

Reductio ad doxa

If I had studied literature or, perhaps, philosophy, my dissertation would have been safely research on the aesthetic value of texts reactionary. The sheer audacity to defend indefensible positions, based on census suffrage, dictatorship, absolute monarchy, integration of church and state, inequality, or whatever-has some romantic, rebellious and even provocative. In this regard, reactionaries are often about artists.

On the other hand, my impression is that the word 'liberal' or left rarely have a sense of humor, with the honorable exception of Marx and some followers.

Take for example the following paragraph from ' Chilean church and political debate ' by Jaime Guzmán:

Our thesis is that the current pro-Marxist position of Catholicism called "progressive" or "Christian left "is the simple logical deduction of its postulates, taken by the mechanics of the facts to their ultimate consequences. The naive, and with them the idiots of all kinds and levels, have been grossly deceived, and are the only ones surprised to find plausible explanation. Things went further than they have thought and desired, but the blame for that, rather than the impenetrability of the events and their projections into the future, it is necessary to look at the sharp limitation of certain minds, who today remains only as a last resort, the goofy grin of embarrassment.


Wonderful, right?